Personal Light Electric Vehicles Interactive Decision Matrix Comparison Charts

Thinking of buying an electric scooter or other lightweight electric transport tool? This is where you can numerically compare Personal Light Electric Vehicles (PLEVs) aka Personal Mobility Devices (PMDs) based on your own specific needs. At the time of writing there is nothing like this anywhere else online. To understand how a decision matrix works see the two minute video below and then read on:

In the interactive self-adjusting decision matrix below, PLEVs are shown in the left column & factors (considerations) are on the top row. For every factor you can enter a weighting (importance value) from 0 (totally unimportant) to 10 (essential). Five participants gave their own weighting numbers & the average weighting numbers are shown. You can replace that weighting number with your own weighting (from 0 to 10).  

For example, partipants considered that ‘Top speed’ is a fairly unimportant factor & gave it a weighting number of 5.6. If you feel ‘Top Speed’ is an even less important consideration, then you might give it a weighting of 2. If you feel ‘Portability’ is important, you might give it a weighting of 8 & so on.

Each PLEV has an achievement score which is how well it performs in that factor area. The achievement score is based on OBJECTIVE data (see base of table for scoring methods). For example, the Urmo gets a low achievement score of 2.5 for the ‘Top speed’ factor because it’s fairly slow.

The objective achievement score is multiplied by your subjective weighting to make a weighting x achievement score. Example: Urmo in the ‘Top speed’ category would be 2.5 (achievement score) x 2 (your weighting) = 5 (weighting x achievement score). The overall score for each PLEV is the sum total of all weighting x achievement scores. The PLEV with the highest score is likely to be the most suitable based on your needs. The table will update automatically as you enter the importance values (weightings).

See below for a quick example video:

The chart no longer works on the webpage as shown in the video above, so just use the buttons below the chart to open or save it.

A STATIC (NON-INTERACTIVE) COMPARISON TABLE (LIGHTWEIGHT PORTABLE TRANSPORT TOOLS)

UPDATE 2026
Having used the tables above to buy and try various transport tools, my favourite one to ride is perhaps the Inmotion E20, but there are safety issues (see table) and on the E20 the importance and value of bike lanes (or mobility lanes, active travel routes) come to light even more! As a reliable urban commuting tool I use my Micro Falcon scooter. It rolls freely even without the motor and actively kicking it along means I get exercise, get more traction and control from the foot on the ground, plus it helps pedestrians feel more at ease (although usually I get off and walk past them). In places where escooters are banned so far I just call it a ‘hybrid’ and so far that’s worked. It’s so small and portable that it’s just less of an issue. Overall I believe this may have the greatest potential as an urban transport tool. It’s out of production at present but I hope that Micro produce an upgraded version with a light, a softer larger front tire with a tread, and a softer deck (I add jelly mats and rubber to help cushion the ride).
Also various other scooters not included here have been highly rated on Electric Scooter Guide.com so check them out as well HERE if interested. 

SAFETY UPDATE IN 2021 – MAKE SURE THE STEM IS LOCKED IN BEFORE RIDING! The handlebar stem on my Kugoo S1 Pro once gave way while riding. I had already gone a couple of miles on it when it came loose. It’s possible that I didn’t click it in properly or it may have come loose while riding. The result was not pretty. The handlebar is a reason why scooters outperform most other transport tools in safety, but be sure you check the handlebar stem is fully locked in place before riding, avoid riding at speed over rough terrain or at least check the stem lock after doing so. Also buy a scooter with an effective stem lock! NOTE: The Kugoo S1, both E-TWOW scooters and the Micro Explorer all use the same basic frame with the same stem lock!

For scooter rental schemes

If you are looking here for a scooter to use in a rental scheme with a capped speed lower than all the top speeds of the scooters shown then you should enter ‘0’ as a weighting (importance value) for the speed factor. Likewise, you may wish to give ‘portability’ a lower weighting given that most users will dock their scooters rather than push or carry them around.

If you would like us to make a revised matrix with additional factors specific to your rental scheme or with other transport tools added just let us know – happy to help! 

OLDER CONTENT SHOWN BELOW

We believe that we now need to embrace lightweight portable transport to help slow global warming, boost people’s well-being through cleaner air & maintaining a safe social distance.

To see mindmaps showing pros and cons of different transport gadgets click HERE

Some older gadgets – a comparison chart made in 2015

ELPT, Electric Lightweight Portable Transport Tools, Electric Mobility Devices

Download
PDF: Transportables
Word File: Transportables

Gadget names

I suggested ‘Transportables‘ (transport tools that are portable)
& also ‘Lightweight Portable Transport‘ (LPT).
Here are some competing names:
Personal transport gadgets (PTGs?)
Personal Light Electric Vehicles‘ (PLEVs) (the term used by the UK government),
Powered Transporters‘,
Rideables‘ (possibly from Wired magazine).

”EUCS” or ”electric unicycles” involve no cyling so it’s a misnomer. Much better to call them Electric self-balancing wheels, electric wheels or just ewheels. Another suggestion I saw was motor wheels.

Personal Light Electric Vehicles (Specs Comparison Charts)

BELOW IS THE OLD VERSION OF THIS POST – TO SEE THE NEW UPDATED VERSION SEE OUR TRANSPORT WEBSITE HERE: https://greentransportideas.org/2020/07/27/transportables-portable-transport-tools/

Here is an attempt at providing the most rigorous, objective and accurate evaluative comparison of LPT (lightweight portable transport) gadgets to date (2020). They are rated as commuting tools using an extension of the ‘Pugh matrix’ known as the Group Average Matrix Evaluation (GAME) system invented by the author (Luc). Transport tools are in the left column & factors (considerations) are on the top row. Each factor has a weighting (importance value) which is the average importance number given by participants. For example, participants saw the portability factor as important so gave it high importance numbers with an average of 8.6 (weighting). The top speed factor was seen as less important & the average is just 5.8 (weighting). For each factor a gadget is given an achievement score which is how well it performs in that factor area. For example, the Urmo with a handle gets a perfect achievement score of 10 for the portability factor because it’s so light, small & can be pushed by the handle. The achievement score is multiplied by the weighting to produce a weighting x achievement score. So for the Urmo in portability it’s 8.6 (weighting) x 10 (achievement score) = 86 (weighting x achievement score) . The overall score for each gadget is the sum total of all weighting x achievement scores.

PLEVs LPT Transport gadgets comparison chart table 1
PLEVs LPT Transport gadgets comparison chart table 2
PLEVs LPT Transport gadgets comparison chart table 3

This will likely be regularly updated in future so best to come back to this page once in a while.To view or download a PDF of the above chart click HERE

LIGHTWEIGHT PORTABLE TRANSPORT TOOLS – INTERACTIVE COMPARISON CHART USING THE SELF-ADJUSTING MATRIX EVALUATION (SAME) SYSTEM (also invented by the author)

So which gadget is right for you personally or for your rental scheme? Simply click on the interactive chart below & enter your own weightings (importance values) for the factors. The scores automatically adjust every time you enter a value & when complete each tool will have an overall score to show how suitable it is likely to be for you.  We’re attempting the impossible – it will never be 100% accurate or comprehensive but should give you a clear objective picture on which to base your intuition. Just replace the default weighting of 5 with your own weighting (from 1 to 10).  Works best with a touchscreen – just swipe within the chart to move around. You can also use the scroll bar within the chart or arrow keys to move around. Your amendments will be reset if you leave this page. For more exact instructions swipe or scroll to the top of the chart.

For scooter rental schemes

If you are looking here for a scooter to use in a rental scheme with a capped speed lower than all the top speeds of the scooters shown then you should enter ‘0’ as a weighting (importance value) for the speed factor. Likewise, you may wish to give ‘portability’ a lower weighting given that most users will dock their scooters rather than push or carry them around. We advocate giving ‘manual use’ (pushing with feet) a high weighting given the importance of exercise, convenience of carrying on if out of charge. Using electric scooters manually can also help oncoming pedestrians to feel more at ease (personal experience) and a lightweight scooter suitable for manual use may also translate into enhanced pedestrian safety. Factors contributing to  ‘manual use’ but not included in the matrix are ‘deck height’ and ‘degree of roll resistance’. A low deck and minimal roll resistance allow a scooter to be used manually.  Among others ET-WOW scooters (AKA uscooters) seem especially suitable in this regard and they are being promoted as suitable scooters for rental schemes. Furthermore some of the ET-WOW scooters have received top ratings from users – see HERE.

If you would like us to make a revised matrix with additional factors specific to your rental scheme just let us know – happy to help. 

UPDATE JULY 2020 – The ‘Zoom’ company seems to be out of business now. Also various other scooters not included here have been highly rated on Electric Scooter Guide.com so check them out as well HERE if interested. 

We believe that we now need to embrace lightweight portable transport to help slow global warming, boost people’s well-being through cleaner air & maintaining a safe social distance while avoiding enclosed spaces with others. If you agree & wish to see more electric devices such as scooters legalised for personal use as well as in rental schemes then please sign this petition: http://chng.it/JgCQNW2pZW

To see mindmaps showing pros and cons of different transport gadgets click HERE

Some older gadgets – a comparison chart made in 2015

ELPT, Electric Lightweight Portable Transport Tools, Electric Mobility Devices

Download
PDF: Transportables
Word File: Transportables

So what should we call these things? I suggested:
Transportables‘ (transport tools that are portable)
& also ‘Lightweight Portable Transport‘ (LPT).
Here are some competing names:
Personal transport gadgets (PTGs?)
Personal Light Electric Vehicles‘ (PLEVs) (the term used by the UK government),
Powered Transporters‘,
Rideables‘ (possibly from Wired magazine).